RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Italy, nephrology residency is available in twenty-one nephrology schools, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The present study is aimed at exploring the residents' satisfaction with their training programs. METHODS: Between April 20th and May 19th, 2021, a questionnaire on residency satisfaction consisting of 49 items was sent to 586 residents and 175 recently certified specialists (qualified to practice as nephrologists in 2019 and 2020), with a response rate of 81% and 51%, respectively. The teaching organization was contextualized with a survey involving 13 European nephrology schools. RESULTS: Most residency fellowship programs received a good rating with regard to "satisfaction", in particular for the following items: number of hospitalizations followed-up, chronic hemodialysis training, follow-up of transplanted patients, diagnosis and treatment of glomerulonephritis. The teachings that were identified as being of lower quality or insufficient intensity included vascular access management, ultrasound diagnostics and renal nutrition. The need for improvement in formal teaching programs was underlined. Young nephrologists were rather satisfied with their salary and with the quality of the work they were doing, but only few were interested in an academic career since it was generally held that it is "too difficult" to obtain a university position. Many young nephrologists who filled in the questionnaire felt that lack of experience in peritoneal dialysis and vascular access management was a barrier to finding an ideal job. Compared to other European training programs, the Italian program differs with regard to longer exposure to nephrology (as compared to internal medicine), and greater flexibility for internships in different settings, including abroad. CONCLUSIONS: This first nationwide survey on the satisfaction of residents in nephrology indicates that, despite rather good overall satisfaction, there is room for improvement to make nephrology a more appealing choice and to fulfill the needs of a growing number of renal disease patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most frequent primary glomerulonephritis and the role of IL-6 in pathogenesis is becoming increasingly important. A recent whole genome DNA methylation screening in IgAN patients identified a hypermethylated region comprising the non-coding RNA Vault RNA 2-1 (VTRNA2-1) that could explain the high IL-6 levels. METHODS: The pathway leading to IL-6 secretion controlled by VTRNA2-1, PKR, and CREB was analyzed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from healthy subjects (HS), IgAN patients, transplanted patients with or without IgAN. The role of double and single-strand RNA in controlling the pathway was investigated. RESULTS: VTRNA2-1 was downregulated in IgAN compared to HS and in transplanted IgAN patients (TP-IgAN) compared to non-IgAN transplanted (TP). The loss of the VTRNA2-1 natural restrain in IgAN patients caused PKR hyperphosphorylation, and consequently the activation of CREB by PKR, which, in turn, led to high IL-6 production, both in IgAN and in TP-IgAN patients. IL-6 levels could be decreased by the PKR inhibitor imoxin. In addition, PKR is normally activated by bacterial and viral RNA, and we found that both the RNA poly(I:C), and the COVID-19 RNA-vaccine stimulation significantly increased the IL-6 levels in PBMCs from HS but had an opposite effect in those from IgAN patients. CONCLUSION: The discovery of the upregulated VTRNA2-1/PKR/CREB/IL-6 pathway in IgAN patients may provide a novel approach to treating the disease and may be useful for the development of precision nephrology and personalized therapy by checking the VTRNA2-1 methylation level in IgAN patients.
